Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Stewart v. Judge of the 15th Judicial District

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 6, 1975No. 48673Published

1Concurrence

HODGES, Vice Chief Justice

(specially concurring).

Under the facts of this case it is apparent the best interest of the minor would be served by the continuation of the petitioners as attorneys to prosecute his pending personal injury actions.

The grandmother had employed competent counsel to pursue the claims of her grandson. The cases had been actively prosecuted and were ready for trial. The grandmother then nominated the bank to be the guardian of the estate of the minor, realizing that if the bank were appointed guardian continuity of counsel would be maintained in the prosecution of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re Fox'EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API