Legal Opinion

Harris v. Alexandria Coca-Cola Bottling Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 6, 1949No. 7333PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action for damages allegedly resulting from the presence of a foreign ingredient, to-wit, a spider, contained in a bottle of Coca-Cola from which plaintiff was drinking. There was judgment in favor of defendant rejecting plaintiff's demands, from which plaintiff has appealed.

It is unnecessary to recite the facts involved in the instant case since we find it necessary to take action with respect to a matter of procedure. Before this Court counsel for defendant strenuously urges the failure of plaintiff's counsel to introduce in evidence, on trial below, the testimony of three of…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dotd v. Standard Const. Co. of Ga.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1989
  2. Townsend v. Peerless InsuranceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API