Legal Opinion · Dissent

Farmers' Elevator Co. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1934No. File No. 7603Published

1DissentRudolph, J.

I believe the judgment should be affirmed. The record is sufficient, in my opinion, to. sustain ■the finding by the trial court that the-trading conducted by Van Kirk for different individuals -was not known or authorized by the corporation. Three of the directors knew nothing about Van Kirk making these trades for individuals, and each of the other directors knew of no other trade being made except his own. The director making the trade for himself, as an individual through Van Kirk, and knowing this was done in the name of the company, was acting adversely to the corporation, and the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Porter v. Hallet & Carey Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API