Legal Opinion

Robare v. Kendall

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1888PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to the district court for Valley county. Tried below before Tiffany, J. cited : Maxwell’s PI. and Pr., 745. Iler v. Earned, 5 Neb. 192. Taylor v. Fitch, 12 Ohio State, 172. Smith v. Finney, 2 ' Neb., 145. Hansen v. Bergquist, 9 Id., 269. cited: Miller v. B. & M. R. R., 7 Neb., 227. Breuit v. People, 5 Neb., 382.

1Opinion of the CourtReese, J.

This action was originally commenced before a justice of the peace of Valley county, judgment in that action being rendered in favor of plaintiff therein. Defendant appealed to the district court. At the May term, 1886, of that court the plaintiff filed a motion in which he moved the court to require defendant to give additional security on the undertaking for appeal. This motion was sustained, and the following order was made and entered upon the journal: “Now, on this 21st day of May, 1886, at the coming in of the court, the defendant, by his attorney, A. M. Robbins, filed an affidavit to…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Galligher v. WolfNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  2. King Bros. v. JacksonNebraska Supreme Court · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API