Legal Opinion

Bohanan v. City of Knoxville

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 2004No. E2003-01306-SC-R3-CVPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · BarkerWilliam M. Barker, J.

in which FRANK F. DROWOTA, III, C.J., and E. RILEY ANDERSON, ADOLPHO A. BIRCH, JR., and JANICE M. HOLDER, JJ. joined.

The employee, a retired police officer, filed suit seeking workers’ compensation benefits. He alleged that his job duties caused him to develop hypertension resulting in permanent partial disability. The employee relies on the statutory presumption of causation for law enforcement officers found in Tennessee Code Annotated section 7 — 51—201(a)(1), and concedes that if the employer has rebutted the presumption, there is insufficient evidence establishing a causal…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Krick v. City of LawrenceburgTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Kellerman v. Food Lion, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Stone v. City of McMinnvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Jones v. Sterling Last Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Coffey v. City of KnoxvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1993

4Cited by11 opinions

  1. Terri Ann Kelly v. Willard Reed KellyTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Tryon v. Saturn Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Board of Professional Responsibility v. CurryTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Paul Pittman v. City of MemphisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2011
  5. Williams v. United Parcel ServiceTennessee Supreme Court · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API