Legal Opinion

Gast v. Brittain

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 10, 2003No. S03G0716PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fletcher, Chief Justice.

We granted certiorari in this case to determine whether the Court of Appeals correctly held that a letter written by the defendant, Andrew Gast, could reasonably be interpreted to state or imply defamatory facts about the plaintiff, Doyle Brittain, Sr. The Court of Appeals reversed the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to Gast and held that his letter could imply objective defamatory facts that are capable of being proved false. Because the letter does not constitute actionable libel, however, we reverse.

Before sending the letter that became the basis of this…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Webster v. WilkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  4. Bergen v. Martindale-Hubbell, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  5. Cox Enterprises, Inc. v. NixSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Douglas Echols v. Spencer LawtonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
  2. Cottrell v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 2016
  3. Bellemeade, LLC v. StokerSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
  4. INFINITE ENERGY, INC. v. PardueCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  5. McCall v. CoutureCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API