Legal Opinion

Virginia National Bank v. Holt

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided December 1, 1975No. Record 750310PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCompton, J.

In this appeal, which results from a suit on a negotiable instrument, we deal with proof of a signature. Pertinent to our consideration are the following italicized portions of Code § 8.3-307, a part of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC):

“§ 8.3-307. Burden of establishing signatures, defenses and due course__(1) Unless specifically denied in the pleadings each signature on an instrument is admitted. When the effectiveness of a signature is put in issue(a) the burden of establishing it is on the party claiming under the signature; but(b) the signature is presumed to be genuine or authorized…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Humble Oil & Refining Company v. CopleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1972
  2. Hillman v. CornettSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. First National Bank of Martinsville v. Roy N. Ford Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1979
  2. First National Bank in Marlinton v. BlackhurstWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Lee v. SUNTRUST BANKCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  4. Waterside Apartments, Inc. v. Havee (In re R. S. Grist Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 1980
  5. David v. Summit Community BankDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API