Legal Opinion

Suk v. JM Bullion, Inc.

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided October 17, 2022No. 3:22-cv-01085Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON SAMUEL SUK, Case No. 3:22-cv-01085-SB Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. JM BULLION, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant. BECKERMAN, U.S. Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff Samuel Suk (“Plaintiff”) filed this action against defendant JM Bullion, Inc. (“Defendant”), alleging a claim for breach of contract. Defendant moves to dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint on the ground that he fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. See FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6). The Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Stine v. StewartTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. ASARCO, LLC v. Union Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Carl Curtis v. Irwin Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  4. Williams v. KhalafTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Rowe v. Educational Credit Management Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API