Legal Opinion
Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided November 16, 2006No. 05-381LPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LETTOW, Judge.
This case involves a claim by the Arkansas Game & Fish Commission (“Arkansas Game”) against the United States for a taking of Arkansas Game’s property without just compensation in contravention of the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution. Arkansas Game avers that the United States Army Corps of Engineers (“Corps”) deviated from a water control plan for Clearwater Lake, a reservoir the Corps operates to control flooding along the Black River in southeastern Missouri and northeastern Arkansas. Specifically, Arkansas Game alleges that the Corps made unauthorized…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Maldonado-Denis v. Castillo-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Micro Motion, Incorporated v. Kane Steel Co., Inc., Cross/appellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- New York State Ass'n for Retarded Children, Inc. v. CareyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Paul Martin and Verla Martin v. Reynolds Metals CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Sparton Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Banks v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- D.R. v. Contra Costa County CADistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024
- Hardy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.