State v. Caldwell
Supreme Court of North Carolina
INDICTMENT against E. M. Caldwell, heard by Judge Frederick Moore, and a jury, at June Term, 1900, of Guil-eobd Superior Court. From a judgment against defendant ■on a special verdict, the defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Eüeches, J.
This is a prosecution for an alleged violation of an ordinance of the city of Greensboro. There was no objection or exception to the manner in which it was commenced, and it may be maintained if the defendant has violated the city ordinance (State v. Higgs, 126 N. C., *5221014), unless the ordinance is in contravention of the doctrine of interstate commerce, and therefore is unconstitutional. The case comes to this Court on appeal of defendant from the judgment of the Court below upon the following special verdict: “That on the .... day of., 1900, the defendant, being employed by…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gloucester Ferry Co. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Crutcher v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Brennan v. TitusvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Emert v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Norfolk Southern Railroad v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Western Oil Refining Co. v. DaltonTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
- State v. . PlummerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923