U'Dreka Andrews v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWolf, J.
I concur in the majority’s certification of the question of great public importance. I dissent, however, from that portion of the opinion that determined the trial court’s order denying the ex parte proceeding did not constitute a departure from the essential requirements of law. An indigent defendant who is represented by private counsel pro bono is entitled to an ex parte proceeding concerning the entitlement to hire expert witnesses and investigators.
To obtain certiorari relief, a petitioner must demonstrate “ ‘(1) a departure from the essential requirements of the law, (2) resulting in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. KaklamanosSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
- Williams v. OkenSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
- Citizens Property Insurance Corp. v. San Perdido Ass'nSupreme Court of Florida · 2012
- Ex Parte MoodySupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.