Legal Opinion

Intrepid, Inc. v. Bennett

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 2015No. 2014-CA-00999-SCTPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DICKINSON, Presiding Justice,

for the Court:

¶ 1. A lease agreement included a five-year renewal provision but failed to specify the rent to be paid during the renewal period. So the circuit judge granted a judgment on the pleadings, finding the renewal provision unenforceable. We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2. Craigside Leasing Corporation leased two tracts of farm land — the 836-acre T.J. Carter Place (“Carter”) and the 1,975-acre Craigside Place (“Craig-side”) — to Intrepid, Inc., for a thirteen-year''term beginning April 1, 1997, and ending December 31, 2009. The annual rent of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hartford Cas. Ins. Co. v. Halliburton Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Leach v. TingleMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
  3. City of Tupelo v. MartinMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Duke v. WhatleyMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Keys v. Rehabilitation Centers, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tower Loan of Mississippi, LLC v. Chuck WillisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
  2. James L. Hughes v. Sandra Humphreys Shipp, David Shipp, Individually, David Shipp d/b/a Rose Lake LLC, and Rose Lake LLC;Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2020
  3. Stacy Sinquefield v. The City of Ridgeland, MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API