Legal Opinion
Adams v. Fry
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 1, 1951No. 35014Published
1Opinion of the Court
204 Okla. 407 (1951)
230 P.2d 915
ADAMS et al.
v.
FRY et al.
No. 35014.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
May 1, 1951.
Hurst & Hurst and Richard B. McDermott, Tulsa, for plaintiffs.
Lewis J. Bicking, Co. Atty., Tulsa County, and Hugh Webster, Asst. Co., Atty., Tulsa County, Tulsa, and Lewis Raba, Co. Atty., Pawnee County, Pawnee, for defendants.
2Per curiam
This is an original action to require payment of claims for judicial salary in addition to that paid by the state as provided by chapter 10, 1947 S.L. 592, 74 O.S. Supp. § 251b. The plaintiffs are the district judges of the 14th District Court Judicial District…
3Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. RitterbuschSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Phœnix Assurance Co. v. Fire DepartmentSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
- Associated Industries of Oklahoma v. Industrial Welfare CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Trustees', Executors' & Securities Ins. v. HootonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- State ex rel. Patterson v. BatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.