Legal Opinion

Hettich v. Hettich

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 20, 1951PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Voorhis, J.

Defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the first as well as the second cause of action in the complaint should have been granted. The first cause of action is to recover $12,900 in installments under a separation agreement made in 1932 which provided that the husband during the lifetime of the wife should pay a monthly amount increasing to $75 after February 1, 1933, for her support and that of a nine-year-old son of the marriage. On August 16, 1935, the marriage was dissolved by a Nevada divorce decree, in an action brought by the wife in which the husband appeared. The divorce…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Galusha v. . GalushaNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Lynn v. LynnNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  3. Ascher v. AscherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  4. Rennie v. RennieNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  5. Hettich v. HettichNew York Court of Appeals · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hettich v. HettichNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. Mackay v. MackayNew York Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API