Mihills Manufacturing Co. v. Day Bros.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Winneshiek Circuit Cowrt. Action on two accepted drafts and an account. The defendants pleaded a counter-claim. There was a trial by jury, verdict and judgment for defendants. The plaintiff appeals..
1Opinion of the CourtSeevers, J.
The counter-claim was based on the following facts: The defendants were dealers in lumber, doors and window-sash, at Decorah and Cresco, Iowa. The plaintiff was a manufacturer of the latter articles at Fond du Lac,. Wisconsin.
The defendants ordered of the plaintiff certain doors and window-sash, which they wrote the plaintiff they desired to-have “shipped about 20th of September, 1876.” The plaintiff undertook to fill the order and have the same ready “about-the 20th of September.”
Nothing was said at the time the order was made, or in-defendant’s acceptance of the same, as to whether the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Griffin v. . ColverNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Richardson v. ChynowethWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hichhorn, Mack & Co. v. BradleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- Myers v. BenderMontana Supreme Court · 1913
- Metropolitan Transfer Station, Inc. v. Design Structures, Inc.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 1982
- Todd v. DaveySupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
- Gibson v. FischerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.