Legal Opinion

Helena Chemical Co. v. Uribe

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided September 20, 2012No. 31,080 30,792PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SUTIN, Judge.

{1} Helena Chemical Company (Helena) filed suit against Arturo Uribe and others for prima facie tort and defamation. A jury awarded nominal damages on Helena’s claims of defamation and prima facie tort. Additionally, it awarded punitive damages, as to which the district court granted a remittitur. Uribe appeals; Helena cross-appeals.

{2} We hold that the district court did not err in entering judgment in favor of Helena on its claim of defamation and that the court properly awarded a remitted amount of punitive damages as to that claim. In regard to prima facie tort, we…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Curtis Publishing Co. v. ButtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Marchiondo v. BrownNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Marchman v. NCNB Texas National BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sunnyland Farms, Inc. v. Central New Mexico Electric Cooperative, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Estate of Saenz v. Ranack Constructors, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Saenz v. Ranack Constructors, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2018
  4. T.H. McElvain Oil & Gas Ltd. P'ship v. Benson-Montin-Greer Drilling Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. T.H. McElvain Oil & Gas Ltd. Partnership v. Group I: Benson-Montin-Greer Drilling Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API