Legal Opinion

Bolds v. Randle

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 23, 1932No. 21637PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

This was an action for damages alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff by reason of the negligence of the defendants while driving their ear on the streets used by pedestrians, and as a consequence of which the plaintiff received certain serious, painful, .and permanent injuries to her person. The jury returned verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $1,000, and from the judgment rendered thereon and the order overruling the motion for new trial defendants appeal by petition in error and case-made; and the only assignments of error presented in the brief are: (1) That the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chestnut Smith v. LynchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Schwentker v. HubbsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Wyant v. LevySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. CriderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wilhite v. BrinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  2. Oliver v. Omnicare, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2004
  3. East Basin Oil & Uranium Company v. PoundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  4. Koch v. E. D. Smith Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. Opinion No. 72-111 (1972) Ag, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API