Legal Opinion
Valley Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation P.C. v. New York Central Mutual Insurance
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided October 10, 2002PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*676OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Order insofar as appealed from unanimously affirmed with $10 costs.
In this action to recover first-party no-fault benefits, defendant’s verified answer alleged six affirmative defenses asserting various improprieties in the manner plaintiff was conducting its business, including that the corporation, formed by a Dr. Lahiri, did not provide medical services, and that fraud was being committed both as to the services rendered and in its billings. Many of these defenses (with a complete factual background) were raised against plaintiff herein and Dr. Lahiri, as…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. MallelaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2001
3Cited by7 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. MallelaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Robert MallelaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Metroscan Imaging, P.C. v. GEICO InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2006
- Carothers v. Insurance CompaniesCivil Court of the City of New York · 2006
- Multiquest, PLLC v. Allstate InsuranceCivil Court of the City of New York · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.