Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Prince George's County v. Longtin
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided April 25, 2011No. 35, September Term, 2010Published
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
HARRELL, J., concurring and dissenting, in which BARBERA, J., joins.
After being charged criminally, but incorrectly, as it turned out, for the murder of his wife, Keith Longtin (“Longtin”) asserted thirteen different civil causes of action1 against Prince George’s County and certain of its police officers. The jury in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County that *501considered the evidence returned a verdict of more than $5 million. On appeal, we are asked, among the questions presented, to decide when the causes of action accrued, triggering the 180-day notice requirement of the Local…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Wallace v. KatoSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Felder v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Ashton v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- DiPino v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.