Legal Opinion

Timothy J. T. v. Karen J. H.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 10, 1998PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The record establishes that petitioner was the defendant in a divorce action in Supreme Court and that, in a verified answer therein, he denied the allegation of respondent that he was the father of her child. The parties entered into a stipulation of settlement pursuant to which respondent withdrew her allegation, and the stipulation was incorporated in the divorce decree. The issue of paternity was resolved in the divorce action in accordance with the position petitioner took in his sworn answer in that action, and he had a full and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. Public AdministratorNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Sandra I v. Harold IAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Susan UU. v. Scott VV.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. Hua Fan v. Wen Zong YuAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. Michael S. v. Karen J. K.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Susan UU. v. Scott VV.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API