Legal Opinion

People v. January

California Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1886No. 20168PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County, from an order denying a motion for an arrest of judgment, and from an order refusing a new trial. The defendant was convicted of the crime of embezzlement, and pending an appeal taken by him, made this application to be admitted to bail. The further facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcKinstry, J.

This is an application to this court, that the defendant be admitted to bail pending an appeal. It does not appear that any like application has been made to the Superior Court or the judge thereof. The power to admit a prisoner to bail pending an appeal taken by him from a judgment of conviction of felony ought not to be exercised by the Supreme Court in the first instance, nor until after the determination upon its merits of an application for bail before the judge who tried the cause. (People v. Perdue, 48 Cal. 552.)

Motion denied.

Thornton, J., McKee, J., Sharpstein, J., and My-rick, J.,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. PerdueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re BrumbackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Ex parte TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. People v. CornellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  4. Ex parte AtkinsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Matter of the Application of PreciadoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API