Legal Opinion

Duquesne Light Co. v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 30, 1960No. Appeal, No. 141PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Per Curiam,

By this appeal we are asked to determine whether the court below was correct when it opened the judg*566meat confessed by appellant against the appellee pursuant to terms of a lease and required the parties to-comply with the arbitration provisions therein contained.

A petition to open a judgment is addressed to the sound discretion of the court and, unless an abuse of such discretion appears, its action will not be reversed. Fogel Refrigerator Company v. Oteri, 391 Pa. 188, 137 A. 2d 225 (1958); Ehnes v. Wagner, 388 Pa. 102, 130 A. 2d 171 (1957).

This confession of judgment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ehnes v. WagnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Fogel Refrigerator Co. v. OteriSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Shannon v. Pennsylvania Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Roche v. RankinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Better Living, Inc. v. FilosaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Commonwealth Bank & Trust Co. v. Coudriet, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Elk County1964
  4. Harry Cramer, Inc. v. Morris, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API