Legal Opinion
Higgins v. Ridgewood Savings Bank
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 7, 1999PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for *358personal injuries, etc., the defendants Ridgewood Savings Bank and Acosta Baudilio appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dowd, J.), dated April 21, 1998, as, upon a jury verdict finding them to be 40% at fault in the happening of the accident, is in favor of the plaintiffs and against them on the issue of liability.
Ordered that the interlocutory judgment is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with one bill of costs payable by the respondents appearing separately and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Leal v. WolffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Rebecchi v. WhitmoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Carter v. Castle Electric Contracting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
- Mascitti v. GreeneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Hurley v. CavitoloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rodriguez v. Budget Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Waters v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Cerda v. ParsleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000