Legal Opinion

State v. Biernacki

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1991No. 89-1484PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.

Defendant-appellant, Tina Biernacki, pled guilty to a charge of distributing marijuana, in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-416(l)(a) (Reissue 1989), and was so adjudged. Her assignments of error merge to claim, in sum, that (1) her plea was neither voluntary nor valid, (2) the plaintiff-appellee State withheld exculpatory evidence or information, (3) she was entrapped, (4) she was the victim of gross and unconscionable overreaching by the State, (5) there were unspecified violations of the 9th and 10th amendments to the Constitution of the United States, (6) her counsel was ineffective, and…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. United States v. ZolinSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. State v. IrishNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  5. United States v. Willie HortonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. ManjikianNebraska Supreme Court · 2019
  2. State v. DunsterNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Harmon Cable Communications of Nebraska Ltd. Partnership v. Scope Cable Television, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. StartNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. WilliamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1997

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API