Legal Opinion

Miniken v. Carr

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1967No. 38519PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Langsdorf, J. †

This is an appeal from a jury verdict favoring plaintiffs Miniken in their action for damages arising from the negligence of defendants Carr. For the sake of convenience, Mrs. Miniken will be considered the sole respondent and Mr. Carr the sole appellant.

Mrs. Miniken, a 57-year-old woman, was seriously in jured when she fell down the basement stairs in Mr. Carr’s law office in Snohomish, Washington. The accident came about in the following manner.

Mr. and Mrs. Miniken were in the process of buying property from clients of Mr. Carr. They were required to sign some closing papers,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Potts v. AmisWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Mills v. Orcas Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1960
  3. McKinnon v. Washington Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Christensen v. Weyerhaeuser Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  5. McNamara v. HallWashington Supreme Court · 1951

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Egede-Nissen v. Crystal Mountain, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Memel v. ReimerWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Nivens v. 7-11 Hoagy's CornerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  4. Botka v. Estate of HoerrCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  5. Botka v. Estate of HoerrCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API