Legal Opinion

Winburn v. Bennington-Rutland Supervisory Union

District Court, D. Vermont

Decided February 28, 1990No. Civ. A. 89-181PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

BILLINGS, Chief Judge.

The sole issue in this case is whether the voting apportionment of the Bennington-Rutland Supervisory Union violates the equal protection clause of the United States Constitution. For the forthcoming reasons the court finds that the Benning-ton-Rutland Supervisory Union Board is not subject to the fourteenth amendment’s guarantee of equal voting strength; therefore, the defendant’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED while the plaintiff’s cross-motion for summary judgment is DENIED.

I. BACKGROUND

The material facts in this case are not in dispute. The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Avery v. Midland CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Hadley v. Junior College District of Metropolitan Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Sailors v. Board of Ed. of Kent Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Attorney General of New York v. Soto-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Nassau County Board of SupervisorsDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1993
  2. Jackson v. NASSAU COUNTY BD. OF SUP'RS.District Court, E.D. New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API