Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Burwell

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 13, 1912PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Corporation Court of the city of Danville, in an action of assumpsit. Judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant assigns error.

1Opinion of the CourtCardwell, J.

The defendant in error, M. P. Burwell, brought this action of assumpsit and recovered a judgment in the Corporation Court of the city of Danville against the plaintiff in error, John E. Hughes, for the sum of $2,570.57, which the plaintiff alleged that the defendant agreed to pay him for an open account which the *599plaintiff held and owned against Swain & Wyllie, a partnership which had but recently made an assignment for the benefit of their creditors.

We are asked to review and reverse this judgment because of error of the court in failing properly to instruct the jury, and in refusing to set…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sanders v. Pottlitzer Bros. Fruit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Pratt v. . Hudson River Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  3. Lyman v. RobinsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Agostini v. ConsolvoSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930
  2. Frank Bowman Co. v. LecatoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API