J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. Puls
Appellate Court of Illinois
Judgment by confession. Appeal from the County Court of Boone county; the Hon. Louis M. Reckhow, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Justice Thompson delivered
the opinion of the court.
Under the contract of warranty appellees, after giving appellant a reasonable opportunity to make the machine fill the warranty, if it then did not, were to return the machine to appellant at the place where it was received and notify the appellant thereof by notice in writing to appellant in Racine, Wisconsin, and also to the agent through whom it was received. The appellant received the letter of December 3, 1906, written by Hicks, and by not replying to it appears to have consented to the proposition of appellees to retain the machine…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. AllisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Crabtree v. KileIllinois Supreme Court · 1859
- Owens v. SturgesIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
- Kemp v. FreemanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1891
- Avery Planter Co. v. PeckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. PulsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1912
- Stave & Timber Corp. in Norfolk v. A. H. Andrews Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- Hakes v. B. Aaron & SonsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913