Legal Opinion
Mutual Oil Refining Co. v. Clay
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided December 19, 1924PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
■Opinion of the Court by
Chief Justice Sampson
Reversing.
This action was commenced in the Clark circuit court by Clay and Neal upon the following acceptance:
“Lexington, Ky., June 23, 1923.
“Mr. C. L. Bell, President,
Mutual Oil and Refining Co., 301 Security Trust Bldg., Lexington, Ky.
“Dear Sir:
“In accordance with the contract between the Mutual Oil and Refining Company and the Arco- Construction Company dated May 5th, 1920, you will please pay to the bearer of this note on July 10, two thousand five hundred dollars; said money to be charged to our account the same as if it had been paid to us…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Star Mills v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
- Bronston's Admr. v. LakesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
- Torian v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
- Myers v. DouglassCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1896
3Cited by4 opinions
- Coons v. Bank of CommerceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
- Cobb v. Farmers & Merchants BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
- Goodall v. Warden's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
- Cain v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936