Legal Opinion

Holmes v. . Davis

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 1859PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] I am of opinion that the principles of the provisions of the Revised Statutes relating to the right to recover the mesne profits of lands, after a judgment in ejectment, remain in force, but that the form of the remedy is that prescribed by the Code. (2 R.S., 310, §§ 44-54.) By these provisions the former action of trespass for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Costigan v. Mohawk & Hudson Rail-RoadNew York Supreme Court · 1846

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Woodhull v. . RosenthalNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Barson v. . MulliganNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  3. Randall-Smith, Inc. v. 43rd Street Estates Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. Vandevoort v. . GouldNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  5. Larned v. . HudsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1874

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API