Holmes v. . Davis
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] I am of opinion that the principles of the provisions of the Revised Statutes relating to the right to recover the mesne profits of lands, after a judgment in ejectment, remain in force, but that the form of the remedy is that prescribed by the Code. (2 R.S., 310, §§ 44-54.) By these provisions the former action of trespass for…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Costigan v. Mohawk & Hudson Rail-RoadNew York Supreme Court · 1846
3Cited by20 opinions
- Woodhull v. . RosenthalNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Barson v. . MulliganNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Randall-Smith, Inc. v. 43rd Street Estates Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Vandevoort v. . GouldNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
- Larned v. . HudsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.