Legal Opinion
Jamil v. Southridge Cooperative, Section No. 4, Inc.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided September 10, 1979PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Judgment of the court below (93 Mise 2d 383) reversed with $30 costs and complaint dismissed.
Plaintiff instituted this action to recover the sum of $2,000 paid by him to defendant. A full and complete statement of the facts is to be found in the opinion of the court below.
A careful review of the evidence reveals that plaintiff never informed defendant, in writing, of his intention to leave the co-operative as the by-laws require. Since plaintiff did not comply with said notice provision, he could not dispose of his stock without affording defendant the first…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Allen v. Biltmore Tissue Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
3Cited by6 opinions
- University Mews Associates v. JeanmarieNew York Supreme Court · 1983
- Berglund v. 411 East 57th Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1984
- Meichsner v. Valentine Gardens Cooperative, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Bland v. Two Trees Management Co.New York Supreme Court · 1984
- Badowski v. Roosevelt Terrace Cooperative, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.