Legal Opinion
Thin Film Lab, Inc. v. Comito
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 3, 2002No. 00 CIV. 3489 MDFPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION ORDER
FOX, United States Magistrate Judge.
The parties consented to try this matter before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). Plaintiff Thin Film Lab, Inc. (“Thin Film”), an optical coating firm headed by Gregory Enzor (“Enzor”), commenced this lawsuit in April 2000 against Defendant Carmelo Comito (“Comito”), a former employee who created his own optical coating firm, Defendant Universal Thin Film Lab, Inc. (“Universal”). Enzor seeks injunctive relief and damages for misappropriation of trade secrets and unfair competition. In particular, Enzor argues that Comito unfairly solicited…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Ashland Management Inc. v. JanienNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Crabtree v. Elizabeth Arden Sales Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
- North Atlantic Instruments, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Fred Haber and Apex Signal Corp., Defendants-Counter-Claimants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- North Shore Bottling Co. v. C. Schmidt & Sons, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Leo Silfen, Inc. v. CreamNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Big Vision Private Ltd. v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Paz Systems, Inc. v. Dakota Group Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2007