United States v. Kelly
Army Court of Criminal Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT ON REMAND
SQUIRES, Senior Judge:
Pursuant to his pleas, appellant was convicted of three specifications involving larceny of basic allowance for quarters (BAQ) and three specifications of fraud, in violation of Articles 121 and 132, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 921 and 932 [hereinafter UCMJ]. Contrary to his pleas, a panel of officers and enlisted members convicted Staff Sergeant (SSG) Kelly of communicating a threat in violation of Article 134, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 834. The convening authority approved the sentence to a dishonorable discharge, confinement…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Sergeant ROBERTO E. TRIGUEROSArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2010