Leonard v. Faber
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by Eberhard Faber, the defendant in each of the above-entitled actions, from three orders of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Trial Term'and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 11th day of May, 1898, denying the defendant’s motion to strike each of the above-entitled actions from the Trial Term calendar.
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam :
These are appeals from orders denying the defendant’s motions to strike these cases from the Trial Term calendar. The application in each case was made upon the same ground, namely, that the note of issue was for a different term than that for which the case was noticed for trial.
That the substantial facts upon which the motions were based are true appears in the papers before us. Notes of issue were filed by the plaintiffs in each case on December 14, 1896, and each was noticed for trial for the January term, 1897. Thereafter the plaintiffs demurred to certain affirmative…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Romaine v. BowdoinNew York Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by8 opinions
- Keilty v. TraynorNew York Supreme Court · 1898
- Tatum v. FarsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- Weaver v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
- Wood v. McGuireCity of New York Municipal Court · 1898
- Neville v. ButlerCity of New York Municipal Court · 1899
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.