Legal Opinion

Interaction, Inc./State v. State/Interaction, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided June 15, 2000No. 03-99-00358-CVPublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEA ANN SMITH, Justice.

The State of Texas sued Boutros Investments, Inc. No. 7 (Boutros 7) and Interaction, Inc. to recover delinquent taxes owed by Boutros 7. Because both defendants failed to answer, the trial court rendered a default judgment against Boutros 7 and Interaction. Interaction filed a petition for bill of review alleging it had not received notice of the State’s suit. The trial court granted the petition, and after a trial to the court, rendered judgment for the State. On appeal, Interaction raises three points of error: that the evidence is factually and legally insufficient…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Peralta v. Heights Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Alexander v. HagedornTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Caldwell v. BarnesTexas Supreme Court · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Davis v. Smith, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
  2. Martinez v. Texas Department of Protective & Regulatory Services, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2003
  3. Ponsart v. Citicorp Vendor Finance, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2002
  4. Ross Mandel and Lea Mandel v. Lewisville Independent School District, County of Denton, City of Plano, and Claussner Holdings, LLCCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  5. Gonzalez v. Tapia, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2009

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API