Interaction, Inc./State v. State/Interaction, Inc.
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
1Opinion of the Court
BEA ANN SMITH, Justice.
The State of Texas sued Boutros Investments, Inc. No. 7 (Boutros 7) and Interaction, Inc. to recover delinquent taxes owed by Boutros 7. Because both defendants failed to answer, the trial court rendered a default judgment against Boutros 7 and Interaction. Interaction filed a petition for bill of review alleging it had not received notice of the State’s suit. The trial court granted the petition, and after a trial to the court, rendered judgment for the State. On appeal, Interaction raises three points of error: that the evidence is factually and legally insufficient…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Peralta v. Heights Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Alexander v. HagedornTexas Supreme Court · 1950
- Caldwell v. BarnesTexas Supreme Court · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Davis v. Smith, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
- Martinez v. Texas Department of Protective & Regulatory Services, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2003
- Ponsart v. Citicorp Vendor Finance, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2002
- Ross Mandel and Lea Mandel v. Lewisville Independent School District, County of Denton, City of Plano, and Claussner Holdings, LLCCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Gonzalez v. Tapia, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2009
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.