Legal Opinion

Crumlish v. Delaware Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided May 15, 1944PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODNEY, J.,

delivering the opinion of the court:

The Chancellor in his opinion, reported in Delaware *378Trust Co. v. Fitzmaurice, ante p. 101, 31 A. 2d 383, did not directly pass upon the interest of John .S. Crumlish in his share of the residuary estate. By inference the Chancellor did consider the matter, for he held that the interest of John S. Crumlish in the fund of $837.88, created by the first codicil, was not subject to the trust set out in item 11 of the original will, but that the trust provisions of item 11 only referred to the interest of John S. Crumlish under item 10 of the will,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Equitable Trust Co. v. SnaderCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1930
  2. Delaware Trust Co. v. FitzMauriceCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1943
  3. Davis v. GoodmanCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1930
  4. Equitable Trust Co. v. SnaderCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1931

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Farmers Bank of State of Delaware v. HowardCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1971
  2. Delaware Trust Co. v. FitzMauriceCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1944
  3. In Re Estate of LaningSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. In Re Estate of LaningSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API