Legal Opinion

City of Amarillo v. Emery

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 5, 1934No. 6839PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Circuit Judge.

H. Emery is the owner of a certain strip of land in Amarillo, Tex., with a building thereon. The city built a viaduct on a public street in front of part of the property and Emery brought suit to recover consequential damages, alleged to have been caused by the impairment of his rights of vision, ingress, egress, and accessibility. The American National Insurance Company, holder of certain vendor’s lien notes on the property, intervened and joined with the plaintiff. There was a verdict for $7,750 in favor of plaintiff. The city moved for a new trial on the ground that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Dallas County v. BarrCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Brabham v. Mississippi Ex Rel. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
  2. Robert Jayson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  3. Primm v. Continental Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1956
  4. Central Fibre Products Co. v. HardinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936
  5. Fort Worth & Denver Railway Company v. A. W. Thompson and W. D. Sides, D/B/A Sides Fruit CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API