Legal Opinion

Coughlin v. Westinghouse Broadcasting & Cable, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 21, 1988No. Civ. A. 87-1299PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION *

LOUIS H. POLLAK, District Judge.

This matter has an extended history. It has its origins in a broadcast in 1982. A television representation of the activities of plaintiff, a Philadelphia police officer, was regarded by plaintiff as defamatory, and he initiated a proceeding sounding in defamation in which the defendant was Westinghouse, the owner of the local television station in question. That proceeding resulted in a grant by Chief Judge Luongo of summary judgment in favor of defendant. 603 F.Supp. 377 (E.D.Pa.1985). Judge Luongo determined that there was no basis for a finding of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. TornilloSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. City of ThibodauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Takeda v. Northwestern National Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  5. Steel Valley Authority v. Union Switch And Signal DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Roberts v. McAfee, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. Steven M. Kramer v. Richard ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  3. Coughlin (James) v. Westinghouse Broadcasting and Cable, Inc., Thompson (James), Kyw-Tv-3Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  4. NATIONAL POLICE ASSOCIATION, INC. v. GANNETT CO., INC.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API