Legal Opinion
Leguizamo v. Costco
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 14, 2024No. Civil Action No. 2023-2166Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ARMANDO LEGUIZAMO, JR Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 23-2166 (LLA) v. COSTCO, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Proceeding pro se, Plaintiff Armando Leguizamo Jr. brings this suit against his former employer, Costco Wholesale Corporation (“Costco”), alleging retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Costco has moved to dismiss for insufficient service and failure to state a claim. ECF No. 4. For the reasons discussed below, the court grants Costco’s motion to dismiss in part and directs Mr. Leguizamo to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Luise Light v. Isabel WolfCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Kaplan v. Cent. Bank of the Islamic Republic of IranCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.