Legal Opinion

Blum v. Sweet Insurance Agency, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 12, 1963No. 63-160PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiffs below appeal from a summary final judgment in favor of the defendants-appellees in an action to recover losses allegedly sustained by reason of the defendant’s failure to include in the fire insurance policy issued on plaintiffs’ property a provision covering said property while vacant or unoccupied without limit of time. It was alleged that the defendant, Sweet Insurance Agency, was specifically directed and instructed to procure that type, of coverage and its negligent failure to do so was the proximate cause of plaintiffs’ loss. The liability of the defendant, American…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. MacGregor v. HosackSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
  2. General Truck Sales, Inc. v. American Fire & Casualty Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
  3. Hettenbaugh v. Keyes-Ozon-Fincher InsuranceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  4. Moore v. McCann Plumbing Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Al Landers Dump Truck, Inc. v. Pemar Insurance Agency, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  2. Margery Lane Corp. v. Underwriters At Lloyd'sDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API