Legal Opinion · Dissent

Crowley v. Walker

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1974No. 11275Published

1DissentBiegelmeier, Chief Justice

My reading of the opinion and an examination of the authorities cited therein compel the conclusion that the general terms deal over-broadly with the question involved in this appeal.

Three executors — the two Walkers and Katherine Biesmann —were appointed in the- will and so by the court. Except for $6,000, Mrs. Biesmann was sole beneficiary under the will.' When it was denied probate she made a settlement with other heirs whereby she became owner of all the property.

In addition to the real estate, the cash and personal property of the estate for which the executors were accountable was…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of HobelsbergerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  2. In Re Estate of HaleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  3. In the Matter of the Estate of RoremSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
  4. Stewart v. BaxterOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Washington Loan & Trust Co. v. Convention of Protestant Episcopal Church of the Diocese of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API