Legal Opinion

People v. Class

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 1986PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

In our earlier opinion in this case, we held that the police *433"officer’s nonconsensual entry into [defendant’s] automobile to determine the vehicle identification number violates the Federal and State Constitutions where it is based solely on a stop for a traffic infraction (US Const, 4th Amdt; NY Const, art I, § 12)” (63 NY2d 491, 493). The Supreme Court reversed on the Federal Constitution, holding that "the police officer’s action does not violate the Fourth Amendment” (475 US —, —, 106 S Ct 960, 963), and the case is now before us again.

In support of its own…

3Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. New York v. QuarlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. New York v. ClassSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by60 opinions

  1. Immuno AG. v. Moor-JankowskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. People v. TorresNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. People v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. People v. P. J. Video, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. State v. LaroccoUtah Supreme Court · 1990

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API