Sears v. Rutishauser
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Concurrence
PRESIDING JUSTICE WEBBER,
concurring in part and dissenting in part:
I agree with my learned colleagues that no error occurred in the treatment of Dr. McMenamin’s testimony; however, I differ seriously with them on the matters concerning the cross-examination of Dr. Rumer and the rebuttal argument of plaintiff’s counsel.
The handling of expert witnesses and their cross-examination may be summed up in the old adage, “Whose bread I eat, his song I sing.” One need only scan the professional journals to observe that experts are for hire in the market place on an almost illimitable number of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ager v. Baltimore Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
- Wilson v. StilwillMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
- Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. SchmitzIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
- Chicago City Railway Co. v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
- Lammert v. WellsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.