Bullfrog Films, Inc. v. Catto
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES
TASHIMA, District Judge.
This is plaintiffs’ renewed motion for attorneys’ fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. §. 2412 (EAJA). A short history of this long case is necessary to the disposition of the motion.
BACKGROUND
This action was brought to challenge the constitutionality of the .regulations promulgated by the United States Information Agency (USIA) to implement the Beirut Agreement, a treaty designed to facilitate the international distribution of educational films. 17 U.S.T. 1578, T.I.A.S. No. 6116. The court held the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Meese v. KeeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Richard S. RUSSELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Hyatt v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- American Constitutional Party, Libertarian Party, Bicentennial Reality Party, and Socialist Workers' Party v. Ralph Munro, Secretary of StateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Patterson Ex Rel. Chaney v. ApfelDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2000
- In Re Oliver L. North (Reagan Fee Application)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Bennett v. YoshinaDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2000
- Sierra Club v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
- United States v. AisenbergDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.