Legal Opinion

Taylor v. County of Copiah

District Court, S.D. Mississippi

Decided August 14, 1995No. Civil Action No. 3:92-cv-523WSPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

WINGATE, District Judge.

Before the court is the motion of the defendants for attorney fees brought pursuant to Rule 111 of the Federal Rules of Civil *582Procedure. Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure was substantially amended on December 1, 1993, but, inasmuch as the matters pertaining to the instant lawsuit took place before that date,2 the newly amended version of Rule 11 is not applicable here. See Childs v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 29 F.3d 1018 (5th Cir.1994). This court’s thorough statement of the facts of this case is set forth…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  2. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Owens v. OkureSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Patricia Thomas v. Capital Security Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  5. Pavelic & LeFlore v. Marvel Entertainment Group, Div. of Cadence Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brenda Singleton v. Jenny Abshier, Bryce Murray, Big Easy Law Firm, and Felix Tassey MathieuDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2026
  2. Ellis v. Clarksdale Public UtilitiesDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2021
  3. Hickman v. Columbus Municipal School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API