Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Robert Ronald Boucher

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 23, 1975No. 74--1533Published

1DissentRoss, Circuit Judge

I would affirm the judgment of the trial court on the basis of Judge Larson’s well reasoned opinion. He found that the government had, by means of circumstantial evidence, established a knowing violation of § 462(a), citing the district court’s opinion United States v. Klotz, No. 4 — 73-Criminal 130 (D.Minn., Nov. 7, 1973) in which Judge Neville said:

The government was able to show the general publicity given to registration requirements through the media and by the posting [of] bulletins and disseminating information through the high schools. It does not strain this court’s thinking to find…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. James Ray GaskillCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
  2. United States v. KlotzCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
  3. United States v. Mark David Albert KlotzCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API