United States v. Robert Ronald Boucher
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1DissentRoss, Circuit Judge
I would affirm the judgment of the trial court on the basis of Judge Larson’s well reasoned opinion. He found that the government had, by means of circumstantial evidence, established a knowing violation of § 462(a), citing the district court’s opinion United States v. Klotz, No. 4 — 73-Criminal 130 (D.Minn., Nov. 7, 1973) in which Judge Neville said:
The government was able to show the general publicity given to registration requirements through the media and by the posting [of] bulletins and disseminating information through the high schools. It does not strain this court’s thinking to find…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. James Ray GaskillCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. KlotzCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Mark David Albert KlotzCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974