Legal Opinion

Wathen v. Fare

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1861Published

APPEAL from the Daviess Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.

The appellee, who was the plaintiff, sued the appellants, who were the defendants, upon a promissory note for the payment of $104.50. The note was payable to one Matthew Shanahan, who, without indorsement, assigned it to the plaintiff. Shanahan was made a defendant to answer as to the assignment, and-having failed to appear was defaulted. The other defendants, Joshua and Raphael Wathen, answered: 1. By a denial. 2. Payment. 3. That the note in suit was executed to Shanahan for the consideration of a certain mare, at the time of its execution purchased of him by the defendants. And the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Poag v. La DueIndiana Supreme Court · 1856

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API