Legal Opinion

Poultney v. Emerson

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 26, 1912PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City (Heuts-lee, J.).

1Opinion of the CourtUeNer, J.

It was provided by the Act of 1884, Ch. 485 (Code, 1904, Art. 21, sec. 88) that all leases of land in this State thereafter made, for a longer period thán fifteen years, should be redeemable after the expiration of fifteen years, at the option of the tenant, for a sum of money equal fi> the capitalization of the rent reserved at the rate of six per cent, unless some other sum not exceeding four per cent, should be specified in the lease, in which event the rent should be redeemable upon the basis thus prescribed. This act became effective April 8th, 1884. Ten days before that date an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. PatteeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  2. Austin v. . AhearneNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Stewart v. GorterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1889
  4. Swan v. KempCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1903
  5. Neale v. PeverleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Columbian Carbon Co. v. KightCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1955
  2. Liberal Savings & Loan Co. v. Frankel Realty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Billig v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1929
  4. Robert H. Robben v. E. A. Obering and Helen Bailey OberingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API