Legal Opinion

Egan v. Forty-Second Street, Manhattanville & St. Nicholas Avenue Railroad

The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo

Decided December 24, 1888PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action, by Patrick Egan against the Forty-Second Street, Manhattanville & St. Nicholas Avenue Railroad Company.

1Opinion of the CourtDugro, J.

The plaintiff moves to set aside a dismissal of the complaint upon trial of this action. The evidence, as 1 remember it, was substantially *531that the plaintiff stepped into a hole in One Hundred and Tenth street, between the rails of a horse-car track, and, catching his foot under the wooden •stringer below the iron rail of one of the tracks, fell, and broke his leg. He claims that he was not negligent, and that the railroad company was so in not closing the hole, and asks for damages.

It does not appear from the evidence that it was the duty of the defendant to keep the space of the street…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Worster v. Forty-Second Street & Grand Street Ferry RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1872

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nicholas v. Topeka Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API