Legal Opinion
Bradley, Arant, Rose & White, a Partnership v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided October 20, 1986No. 85-7796PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
In this case, we affirm the district court’s ruling that it lacked jurisdiction over this law firm’s lawsuit against the United States, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2410.
In 1970, Brad’s Machine Products, Inc. (Brad’s) retained Bradley, Arant, Rose & White (law firm), to represent it in defending charges alleging federal tax deficiencies and also to pursue claims for federal income tax refunds for the fiscal years 1967-69. In December, 1970, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) made a jeopardy tax assessment against Brad’s, which froze its assets and resulted in the closing of the business. Brad’s and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Minnesota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
3Cited by5 opinions
- Brewer v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Beeman v. OlsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Credit Bancorp, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Beeman v. OlsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Madan v. US BY AND THROUGH IRSDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1994